Tomorrow, October 27th 2015, will see a key vote in the European Parliament on net neutrality. Ahead of this, here is a blog post from Sir Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, and founding director of the Web Foundation.
Tomorrow, members of the European Parliament face a key vote on the future of the Internet. The proposed regulations in front of them are weak and confusing. To keep Europe innovative and competitive, it is essential that MEPs adopt amendments for stronger “network neutrality” (net neutrality).
When I designed the World Wide Web, I built it as an open platform to foster collaboration and innovation. The Web evolved into a powerful and ubiquitous platform because I was able to build it on an open network that treated all packets of information equally. This principle of net neutrality has kept the Internet a free and open space since its inception.
Since then, the Internet has become the central infrastructure of our time — every sector of our economy and democracy depends on it.
To strengthen and clarify the proposed EU net neutrality rules, here are the amendments that MEPs should insist on:
- The current proposal allows ISPs to create fast lanes for companies that pay to have their content load faster by calling them “specialized services”. Fast lanes will make it harder for anyone who can’t pay extra fees — start-ups, small businesses, artists, activists, and educators in Europe and around the globe — to reach Europeans online. MEPs should vote for the amendments that close the so-called “specialized services” loophole to prevent the creation of online fast lanes and keep the Internet a level playing field.
- The current proposal permits ISPs to exempt applications from users’ monthly bandwidth cap (“zero-rating”). Economic discrimination is just as harmful as technical discrimination, so ISPs will still be able to pick winners and losers online. MEPs should adopt the amendments that allow member states to create their own rules regulating the harmful practice of zero-rating. That way, States which have already banned this practice will be able to continue to do so, while others can move to protect innovation if they choose.
- The proposal allows ISPs to define classes of services, and speed up or slow down traffic in those classes, even in the absence of congestion. As well as harming competition, this also discourages encryption: many ISPs lump all encrypted services together in a single class, and throttle that class. MEPs should vote for the amendments that ban class-based discrimination to protect users, competition, privacy, and innovation online.
- The proposal allows ISPs to prevent “impending” congestion. That means that ISPs can slow down traffic anytime, arguing that congestion was just about to happen. MEPs should vote to close this loophole.
If adopted as currently written, these rules will threaten innovation, free speech and privacy, and compromise Europe’s ability to lead in the digital economy.
To underpin continued economic growth and social progress, Europeans deserve the same strong net neutrality protections similar to those recently secured in the United States. As a European, and the inventor of the Web, I urge politicians to heed this call. Meanwhile, the Web belongs to all of us, and so it’s up to each one of us to take action. European residents can visit the savetheinternet.eu website today to contact their MEP and ask them to vote for the amendments that will protect the open Internet for us and future generations.
– Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, Founding Director of the World Wide Web Foundation
END OF SIR TIM’S BLOG POST
Further background and more sources on Net Neutrality in Europe
Yesterday, more than thirty leading Internet firms and investors signed an open letter to the European Parliament that urged the parliament to adopt amendments. The letter is signed by tech industry leaders such as Automaticc, inc (WordPress.com), BitTorrent, Etsy, Foursquare, Kickstarter, Netflix, Reddit, Soundcloud, Tumblr, and Vimeo. The coalition also includes leading venture capitalists such as Fred Wilson and Brad Burnham (Union Square Ventures), Brad Feld (Foundry Group), David Pakman (Venrock), and thought leaders such as Mike Butcher.
The amendments are supported by a broad coalition:
- European digital rights organisations such as Initiative Netzfreiheit, Edri, La Quadature du Net, Digitale Gesellschaft, Bits of Freedom, Open Rights Group, IT Politisk Forening, Xnet, InfoHouse;
- International public interest organisations such as Access Now, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Reporters without Freedom, Web We Want, and Start-ups for Net Neutrality;
- U.S. public interest, grassroots, and advocacy organisations such as Demand Progress, Fight for the Future, Free Press, the Future of Music Coalition, which represents musicians, Engine Advocacy, which represents start-ups;
- EU and U.S. start-ups and technology companies such as BitTorrent, Etsy, Foursquare, Kickstarter, Meetup, Netflix, Tumblr, Reddit, Soundcloud, Twilio, and Vimeo;
- Venture capitalists such as Brad Burnham and Fred Wilson from Union Square Ventures and other leading venture capitalists from Europe and the U.S.;
- German media authorities (Landesmedienanstalten);
- Faith leaders such as Rev. Otis Moss III, Brian McLaren, and Sister Simone Campbell; and
- Thought leaders such as Mike Butcher of TechCrunch, and Barbara van Schewick of Stanford Law School.
lauro corredoira corredoira
October 26, 2015
Por la neutralidad total de la red, esta ley tal como está redactada amenaza la libertad de expresión y la privacidad y frenará el crecimiento económico continuo y el progreso social de todos los europeos.
Hans Lunde Jensen
October 27, 2015
I agree to "If adopted as currently written, these rules will threaten innovation, free speech and privacy, and compromise Europe’s ability to lead in the digital economy."We need to build an internet that sets our children free not enslaves them
October 28, 2015
You are the only one responsible for what your children do as long as they are not adults (>18 years), this meaning that you should control what they do, but you cannot force all of us to be submitted to the control of the telecommunication companies.
October 28, 2015
I'd like to find out if my MEP voted for or against the amendments. I think whilst they are a mass, they have no accountability or responsibility.A campaign to have them voted out might just help them understand what the public feel about betrayal (or capable stupidity) Indeed I'd like to understand how all the MEPs voted, by country, by party.
December 8, 2015
Why not ask them? Repeatedly, if necessary. Their email addresses are available on the EU's site.It will remind them you are interested. It will remind them that they are there to serve (!!). If a lot of people regularly ask this question it might even be reported (??!)
Giovanni De Gasperis
October 28, 2015
UE is privatizing a shared communication channel that belongs to humanity.This is the worst scandal in history, not better that Palmyra temple destruction. Our descendents will regret to have us as ancestors.Over 9000 reasons to fight this outrage to humanity!