Read the latest from the Web Foundation

News and Blogs

Photo credit: Asian Development Bank (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Photo credit: Asian Development Bank (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

UN Broadband Commission adopts new target for affordable internet

Web Foundation · January 24, 2018

Connecting the 50% of the world that is still offline means, in large part, ensuring that everyone, everywhere is able to access an internet that is affordable. Yesterday, the United Nations Broadband Commission took an important step to realise this goal by adopting a new, more ambitious affordability target  — entry-level internet available for 2% or less of GNI per capita.

The Alliance for Affordable Internet (A4AI) — an initiative of the Web Foundation — first proposed this new target in 2016. A “1 for 2” target (i.e., 1GB of mobile broadband available for 2% or less of average monthly income), A4AI argued, would enable all levels of income earners across low- and middle-income countries to afford a basic connection. Since then, the new affordability threshold has been adopted across national governments (Nigeria, Ghana), regional bodies (the Economic Community of West African States), and now, the wider international community.

The news was shared yesterday at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum, when the UN Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development released a new set of targets aimed at bringing the last billions online and achieving the wider set of Sustainable Development Goals.

At the Web Foundation, we’re pleased and encouraged to see the Broadband Commission adopt the “1 for 2” target as the new standard for affordable internet, and believe that striving towards this level will enable billions more to afford access, moving us that much closer toward our shared goal of digital equality and an internet that is available to, used by, and empowering for all.

 

A full list of the Broadband Commission’s 2025 Targets, as well as background on the Commission itself, can be found in this press release. More about the “1 for 2” target can be found in the A4AI brief on the need to redefine “affordable internet” and in its 2015-16 Affordability Report, as well as in this blog post celebrating adoption of the new target.

Learn more about A4AI, and follow them on Twitter at @A4A_Internet.

Your comment has been sent successfully.
  1. Bob West

    January 27, 2018

    Accessing Internet via mobile in some - if not most - "rich" countries could be more costly than in many "poor" countries. This is due to the ruthless monopoly of mobile networks providers. In Canada, for example, it looks like legalized "robbery". Play with: https://www.telus.com/en/bc/mobility/planbuilder. Even though the data cost is "moderate" $30, the minimum entry, thus the real cost, is $70. If you think you can have some control by opting for so-called "pay-as-you-go" plan (which by the way is misleading fraudulent advertising) you, a minimal phone user, are not better because the minimum $10 each month will be taken by Telus in case you did not use it. Regardless whatever your moral stance is on that issue, I am sure, you would yell for criminal justice any time when a pickpocket takes $10 away from your very own pocket. Now let's do the math. A "poor" Canadian senior supported (!) by GIS (Guaranteed Income Supplement) can count on getting max between $1,500 - $1,800 a month. 2% = $ 30 versus $70 Telus minimum entry greed-deal. This is the reality. And it looks worse toward the future since no-one can/will be able to function in modern society without a cell phone. Blackmail? Extortion? Mafia protection fee from not being able to access government services, your bank account or even your own email - Did I not mention an ambulance?

    Reply

    Your comment has been sent successfully.
    1. Wifi Chennai

      January 30, 2018

      Thank You UN Broadband.

      Reply

      Your comment has been sent successfully.
      1. Matt

        January 20, 2021

        Hi, your article was great. It was very helpful and much needed information. Your article was clear, consistent, and well-researched. Thanks.

        Reply

        Your comment has been sent successfully.