Governments should be protecting our online privacy, not destroying it
Web Foundation · March 8, 2017
Yesterday, Wikileaks published what it claims is a cache of confidential documents from the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), detailing the agency’s hacking and surveillance capabilities. Amongst the key allegations are that the CIA has developed ways to hack connected devices such as televisions, has compromised the operating systems of popular smartphones, and has failed to make product manufacturers aware of security flaws in their products. The Web Foundation – established by the web’s inventor, Sir Tim Berners-Lee – is calling for answers and a response from the US government.
Craig Fagan, Policy Director at the Web Foundation said:
“Governments should be safeguarding the digital privacy and security of their citizens, but these alleged actions by the CIA do just the opposite. Weaponising everyday products such as TVs and smartphones – and failing to disclose vulnerabilities to manufacturers – is dangerous and short-sighted. It puts people around the world at risk of attack from hackers and repressive regimes, and this leak itself shows just how likely such tools are to spread beyond the organisation that developed them.
“Going after devices circumvents the work that has been done to bolster encryption as a safeguard to our data privacy, particularly in the aftermath of past revelations about government surveillance.
“If these new assertions prove true, we call on the Trump administration and other governments to stamp out such practices. The problem is widespread – in 2014 our Web Index research showed that 83% of countries had weak or non-existent safeguards to protect the privacy of online communications. Now is the time to address this – these issues will only magnify as more devices are connected and machine-to-machine communications become even more common.
“The Web Foundation urges governments to take urgent steps to protect our digital privacy and security – including checks and balances to protect citizens from any overreach by security forces. We need political reform – if we try to rely on technical solutions alone, governments will simply stay one step ahead by learning how to crack the technologies. For their part, companies must step up to the plate too – by pressuring governments to make these reforms, while also investing more in device security and encrypting data to and from connected devices by default.”
March 11, 2017
March 12, 2017
Yes, however tell us how to build salience among the public concerning privacy rights and protecting personal identity. The public appears 😐
March 11, 2017
Yes, your comments are spot on. These people making this happen are evil (nothing else to call it) traitors. Where is our justice system in a time like this? For the last sixteen years, where are they? This hurts, just like everything we have let happen since Nov. 2000. Thank God for Wikileaks.
March 11, 2017
I understand your organization & partners are pushing the government to address these concerns. Would an online petition supported by citizens help?
March 24, 2017
If you want to support a petition, try this one http://goo.gl/rS4HKp Because the USA won their case against Iran in 1980 about the Embassy 'hostages'; and the International Court of justice effectively ruled that the UDHR was legally binding on every UN Member State henceforth.But none seem to have complied with it. And Article 12 of it applies to all forms of communication :-"No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.", especially from State attacks.So please support and share using #TIBOHR too.
March 13, 2017
Not sure how you can chastise the government for compromising data while praising Wikileaks in the same sentence. To point though, what if instead of hacking toolkits, you discovered the CIA had guns? Would you make the same inference that the CIA was shooting its own citizens? Or would you assume the CIA was using their guns in a responsible manner to keep their citizens safe? And would you allow some 2nd Amendment latitude for the occasional gun or two ending up in the hands of criminals?